Pharmacists for Fair Reimbursement What your state's PBM laws actually mean for community pharmacies
State Tracker Updated June 15, 2026

Mississippi: what the PBM reimbursement law requires

Mississippi lets a pharmacy appeal a MAC reimbursement as being below its acquisition cost; when the appeal is upheld, the PBM must raise payment to at least the pharmacy's acquisition cost. It also bars a PBM from paying a pharmacy less than it pays its own affiliate. There is no fixed NADAC-plus-fee schedule.

Status Enacted
Law Miss. Code § 73-21-156 (Pharmacy Benefit Prompt Pay Act, 2020)
Effective date January 1, 2021
Reimbursement basis Acquisition-cost floor enforced through appeals (PBM must pay at least the pharmacy's acquisition cost on a successful appeal); no below-affiliate reimbursement
Professional dispensing fee Not specified in statute
Appeal route Appeals procedure required; the pharmacy must be allowed up to ~30 business days to file, and the PBM must respond within 30 business days; MAC lists updated within 3 calendar days

Mississippi’s Pharmacy Benefit Prompt Pay Act enforces an acquisition-cost floor through its appeals mechanism, much like Arkansas. A pharmacy may challenge a MAC reimbursement as being below its pharmacy acquisition cost — the wholesaler invoice price — and when the appeal is upheld the PBM must raise the payment to at least that acquisition cost. Separately, a PBM may not pay a pharmacy less than it pays its own affiliate for the same service.

The statute requires a reasonable appeals procedure with dedicated contact methods, allows up to about 30 business days to file, requires the PBM to respond within 30 business days, and requires MAC lists to be updated within 3 calendar days. It does not set a fixed NADAC-plus-dispensing-fee schedule.

Sources

Back to the tracker